Sources

Every claim in every document this workspace produces traces back to a row on this screen. That is the whole point of it.

The screen says it in one line: "Everything collected in this workspace, newest first. Every claim in every artifact traces back to a row here."

Three tabs sit over Sources and the two screens beside it: Chain, Sources, Evidence.

If the gate has refused, a banner says so in capitals: THIS BANK IS NOT FIT TO GENERATE FROM, then the date it ran, then the reasons. Each reason is a measured line, not an opinion. For example: 30 evidence rows where the gate wants 40, "under this a single row moves a quadrant share by more than 2.5 points. The bank is thin, which is not the same as suspect."

The fix for a thin bank is always the same: more real material. More reviews, more pages of your own site read, your ad library, the documents you already have. Every one of those is a step in The six setup steps.

Everything, A customer's words, Said about customers, The brand's words, each with its count. That split matters more than it looks: a bank that is all brand words has nothing a customer actually said in it, and copy written from it will sound like a brochure.

Opening a row gives you its state, its kind, what it produced ("1 passage, 0 evidence rows") and when it was collected, then three blocks:

Provenance, "Where this came from, and what can be checked against it": URL, source type, collector, author. A row with no URL says so plainly, that it "cannot be checked against anything outside the system".

What the quality gate said about that one row.

Passages and evidence, the text itself and the quoted lines taken out of it.

Some rows carry NOBODY FETCHED THIS. The screen explains it in full rather than in a tooltip: nobody pulled the material from the platform that holds it, it was handed over as a file, a paste or an export, so nothing in the system can vouch for where its text came from or whether the people in it exist.

That is the shape of an imported review dump. It is a fact about the row, not a complaint about it. Copy generation refuses to run on these by default, which is deliberate.